Why These 6 Cosmetic Procedures Are Becoming Less Popular

In the world of cosmetic surgery, what’s in vogue today might be old news tomorrow. As beauty trends continue to evolve and technology advances at lightning speed, procedures that were once the gold standard are now slipping into obscurity. From the dramatic transformations of the early 2000s to the subtle enhancements that define today’s aesthetics, the landscape of cosmetic surgery is in constant flux.

In this blog post, we’ll journey through the fading fads of the beauty world, exploring the once-popular surgeries that are now on their way out. We’ll delve into the reasons behind their decline, from the rise of more effective, non-invasive alternatives to the changing preferences of those seeking enhancement. Join us as we uncover the treatments that are losing their luster and shine a light on the new-age procedures that are redefining beauty for a new generation. Whether you’re a beauty enthusiast or simply curious about what’s trending in the world of aesthetics, this exploration of the vanishing acts in cosmetic surgery is sure to fascinate you.

1- Traditional brow lift

The traditional surgical brow lift, once a go-to procedure for those seeking a more youthful and refreshed appearance, has seen a decline in popularity in recent years. This procedure typically involved making incisions along the hairline or scalp to lift and tighten the skin on the forehead, thereby raising the eyebrows and reducing the appearance of wrinkles and sagging skin. The goal was to create a more alert and youthful look by addressing the drooping or furrowing that often accompanies aging.

Reasons for decline in popularity

Several factors have contributed to the decreasing demand for traditional surgical brow lifts:

• Invasiveness and recovery time: Traditional brow lifts are invasive, requiring significant incisions, anesthesia, and an extended recovery period. Patients often experience swelling, bruising, and discomfort, with full recovery taking several weeks. In today’s fast-paced world, many individuals are seeking quicker, less invasive procedures that offer similar results without extensive downtime.
• Scarring concerns: While skilled surgeons can minimize visible scarring, there is always a risk of noticeable scars, especially if the patient heals poorly or experiences complications. This risk can be a significant deterrent for those concerned about long-term aesthetic outcomes.
• Changing beauty trends: There has been a shift in beauty standards towards more natural-looking results. The highly arched or "surprised" look, which could sometimes result from a traditional brow lift, is no longer as desirable. Patients today prefer subtle enhancements that maintain their natural facial expressions, avoiding the exaggerated look of the past.
• Availability of less invasive and modified alternatives: One of the most significant factors in the decline of traditional brow lifts is the rise of modified surgical techniques and non-surgical alternatives. Procedures like the temple lift, which focuses on the outer brows and temples, offer a less invasive option with fewer risks and quicker recovery. Additionally, non-surgical methods provide the benefits of a brow lift without the need for surgery.

Popular alternatives to the traditional brow lift

With an increased desire for less invasive procedures, modified versions of brow lifts and non-surgical alternatives have gained popularity. These alternatives offer similar benefits with fewer risks and quicker recovery times:

• Temple lift: The temple lift is a modified version of the brow lift that targets the outer portion of the brows and temples, providing a subtle lift with smaller incisions. This approach results in less scarring and a faster recovery, appealing to those looking for a more conservative enhancement.
• Botox: Botox injections can offer a temporary brow lift by relaxing the muscles that pull the eyebrows downward. This minimally invasive procedure provides a subtle lift, smooths wrinkles, and requires no recovery time. Results typically last for several months, making it a convenient option for those looking for a quick fix.
• Thread lifts: Thread lifts involve inserting dissolvable threads under the skin to lift and tighten the brow area. This procedure is less invasive than traditional surgery, with minimal downtime, and results can last up to a year or more. The threads also stimulate collagen production, helping to maintain the lifted appearance over time.
• Ultherapy: Ultherapy uses ultrasound technology to stimulate collagen production and tighten the skin. It’s a non-invasive procedure that can lift the brow area with no downtime, and the results can last for a year or more. This treatment appeals to those seeking a natural enhancement without any incisions.
• Dermal fillers: While typically used to add volume to other areas of the face, dermal fillers can also be strategically placed around the eyebrows to lift and contour the area. This option is minimally invasive, with immediate results and little to no recovery time.

2- Buttock implants

Buttock implants, once a popular choice for individuals seeking a fuller, more rounded buttock appearance, have seen a significant decline in popularity over the past few years. This procedure involves the surgical insertion of silicone implants into the buttocks to enhance their size and shape. However, several factors have contributed to its waning appeal, leading many patients and practitioners to favor alternative methods.

Reasons for the decline in popularity

The decline in the popularity of buttock implants can be attributed to a combination of high complication rates, the availability of more natural-looking alternatives like the Brazilian butt lift, and a cultural shift towards embracing natural body shapes. As patients and surgeons alike seek procedures that provide safer, more natural, and more aesthetically pleasing results, buttock implants are becoming increasingly obsolete in favor of newer, less invasive techniques that align better with contemporary beauty standards. Here are the main reasons buttocks implants are becoming less popular:

• High risk of complications: Buttock implants carry a higher risk of complications compared to other cosmetic procedures. Issues such as infection, implant displacement, asymmetry, and capsular contracture (where the tissue around the implant hardens) are not uncommon. These complications can lead to additional surgeries, prolonged recovery times, and, in some cases, unsatisfactory results.
• Unnatural look and feel: One of the major drawbacks of buttock implants is that they can sometimes result in an unnatural appearance or feel. The implants might not move naturally with the body, and in some cases, they can be noticeable to the touch or even visible beneath the skin. As beauty trends have shifted towards more natural aesthetics, the demand for procedures that offer a more authentic look and feel has grown.
• Advancements in fat transfer techniques (Brazilian butt lift): The rise of the Brazilian butt lift (BBL) has been a significant factor in the decline of buttock implants. The BBL involves liposuction to remove fat from other areas of the body, such as the abdomen or thighs, which is then purified and injected into the buttocks. This procedure offers a dual benefit: it enhances the buttocks while also contouring the donor areas, resulting in a more natural and harmonious overall appearance. The use of the patient's own fat also eliminates the risks associated with foreign implants, such as rejection or hardening.
• Cultural shift toward body positivity and natural beauty: There has been a broader cultural shift toward body positivity and embracing natural body shapes. This has influenced the popularity of cosmetic procedures, with many individuals opting for enhancements that align with their natural proportions rather than drastically altering their appearance. Buttock implants, which can sometimes create an exaggerated or artificial look, have fallen out of favor as a result.
• Longer recovery time and discomfort: The recovery process for buttock implants is often longer and more uncomfortable compared to less invasive procedures like fat transfer. Patients need to avoid sitting directly on their buttocks for weeks, and the recovery can involve significant swelling, bruising, and pain. The downtime required for this procedure is a major deterrent for many people, especially when alternative procedures offer shorter recovery periods.

Popular alternatives

As buttock implants have declined in popularity, several alternative procedures have emerged that offer similar or even superior results with fewer risks and more natural outcomes. Here are the main alternatives to buttock implants:

• Brazilian butt lift (BBL): The Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL) is the most popular alternative to buttock implants. This procedure involves liposuction to remove fat from other parts of the body, such as the abdomen, thighs, or flanks. The extracted fat is then purified and injected into the buttocks to enhance their size and shape.

Because the procedure uses the patient’s own fat, the results are generally more natural in both appearance and texture compared to silicone implants. Additionally, the BBL not only enhances the buttocks but also slims and contours the areas from which the fat is harvested, leading to an overall more balanced and sculpted appearance. A BBl is also much safer than a butt implants surgery. Since the procedure doesn’t involve foreign materials, there’s no risk of implant rejection or complications associated with silicone implants, such as capsular contracture. That said, the BBL still carries risks, particularly if too much fat is injected or if the procedure is performed by an inexperienced surgeon. It’s crucial to choose a highly qualified and experienced plastic surgeon for this procedure.

• Sculptra butt lift: The Sculptra Butt Lift is a non-surgical alternative that involves injecting Sculptra, a poly-L-lactic acid dermal filler, into the buttocks. Sculptra stimulates the body’s own collagen production, gradually enhancing the volume and contour of the buttocks over time.

Sculptra butt lift is a non-surgical procedure, with minimal downtime and discomfort. The results develop gradually, providing a subtle and natural enhancement that avoids the exaggerated look sometimes associated with implants. Since there are no incisions, there’s no scarring, making it an appealing option for those who want a discreet enhancement.

3- Permanent lip implants

Lip implants, once a favored choice for those seeking permanently fuller lips, have seen a significant decline in popularity over recent years. This procedure involved the surgical insertion of silicone or other biocompatible materials into the lips to enhance their size and shape. However, several factors have led to a decrease in demand for lip implants as patients increasingly seek less invasive, more customizable options.

Reasons for decline in popularity

The decline in the popularity of lip implants reflects a broader trend towards less invasive, more flexible cosmetic procedures that offer natural-looking results. As beauty standards continue to evolve, the focus is increasingly on subtle enhancements that can be tailored to individual preferences, providing a more personalized approach to lip augmentation. Here are the main reasons for the lip implants becoming less popular:

• Invasive procedure: Lip implants require surgery, involving incisions and the placement of implants under the lip tissue. While the procedure can provide permanent results, it also comes with the risks associated with any surgical intervention, such as infection, scarring, and the possibility of asymmetry or implant displacement. For many, the invasiveness of the procedure is a significant deterrent.
• Unnatural look and feel: One of the major drawbacks of lip implants is that they can sometimes create an unnatural look or feel. The implants may not blend seamlessly with the natural tissue, leading to a rigid or overly firm sensation when touched. In some cases, the implants might be noticeable, both visually and tactilely, which goes against the current trend towards achieving a more natural appearance.
• Permanent nature of the procedure: While some people appreciate the long-lasting results of lip implants, others find the permanence to be a downside. If the patient is unhappy with the results or if beauty standards change, reversing or removing the implants requires additional surgery, which carries its own risks and complications.
• Rise of non-surgical alternatives: The development of non-surgical lip enhancement options has greatly contributed to the decline of lip implants. These alternatives offer the benefits of lip enhancement without the need for invasive surgery, making them more appealing to a broader range of patients.
• Changing beauty standards: There has been a shift in beauty trends towards a more natural and subtle enhancement. The exaggerated, overfilled lips that were once in vogue have fallen out of favor, with many now preferring a softer, more natural look. This change has further diminished the appeal of permanent lip implants, which can sometimes result in an overly dramatic appearance.

Popular alternatives to lip implants

As the demand for lip implants has waned, several non-surgical alternatives have gained popularity. These options provide more flexibility, less risk, and results that can be adjusted or reversed if desired:

• Dermal fillers (hyaluronic acid fillers): Dermal fillers, particularly those made from hyaluronic acid, have become the go-to option for lip enhancement. These fillers are injected into the lips to add volume, shape, and definition. The lip filler procedure is quick, minimally invasive, and customizable to achieve the desired level of fullness.

The results are immediate, and since hyaluronic acid is naturally occurring in the body, the risk of allergic reactions is low. If the patient is unhappy with the results, the fillers can be dissolved with an enzyme called hyaluronidase, providing a high level of control over the final outcome.

• Lip flips (botox injections): A lip flip involves injecting small amounts of Botox into the muscles around the upper lip. This relaxes the muscles, allowing the lip to flip slightly outward, creating the appearance of a fuller lip without adding volume.

This non-invasive procedure is quick, with minimal discomfort and no downtime. The results are subtle, enhancing the lips' natural shape rather than dramatically altering their size. The effects of a lip flip last about 2 to 3 months, making it an option for those looking for a temporary or subtle enhancement.

• Fat transfer (lipofilling): Fat transfer involves harvesting fat from another part of the patient's body (such as the abdomen or thighs) and injecting it into the lips to add volume. This technique is also known as lipofilling or fat grafting.

Since the procedure uses the patient’s own fat, there is no risk of allergic reaction or rejection. The results can be long-lasting, and the lips feel natural because they are composed of natural tissue.

• Temporary lip plumpers: For those looking for a non-permanent, non-invasive option, topical lip plumpers provide a temporary boost in lip volume. These products contain ingredients that temporarily swell the lips, giving them a fuller appearance. Easy to use and without the need for injections or surgery, lip plumpers are ideal for a quick, short-term enhancement. 

4- Chemical peels

Chemical peels, once a staple in dermatology and cosmetic treatments for skin rejuvenation, have experienced a decline in popularity in recent years. This procedure involves applying a chemical solution to the skin, which causes the outer layers to exfoliate and eventually peel off, revealing smoother, more youthful skin underneath. While chemical peels can be effective for treating various skin concerns such as wrinkles, pigmentation, and acne scars, several factors have led to their decreased use, with patients and practitioners increasingly opting for alternative treatments.

Reasons for decline in popularity

Chemical peels is still an option for various skin concerns but its popularity has declined over the last years due to several reasons.

• Risk of side effects and complications: Chemical peels, especially deeper peels, carry a higher risk of side effects and complications. These can include prolonged redness, irritation, scarring, changes in skin pigmentation (hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation), and infection. The recovery period can also be lengthy and uncomfortable, with peeling, sensitivity, and the need to avoid sun exposure. These risks make chemical peels less appealing compared to other treatments that offer similar results with fewer complications.
• Pain and discomfort: The process of a chemical peel, particularly medium to deep peels, can be quite painful. The application of strong acids to the skin can cause a burning or stinging sensation, and the recovery process can involve significant discomfort as the skin heals. Many patients prefer less painful alternatives that offer a more comfortable experience.
• Long downtime: Deeper chemical peels often require a significant amount of downtime. Patients may need to take time off work and avoid social activities for several days to weeks as their skin recovers. During this time, the skin can appear red, swollen, and scaly, which can be difficult to conceal. In contrast, many modern skin treatments offer minimal downtime, making them more convenient for people with busy lifestyles.
• Emergence of advanced alternatives: Technological advancements in skincare have led to the development of more effective and less invasive alternatives to chemical peels. These newer treatments can address the same skin concerns with greater precision, less discomfort, and shorter recovery times, making them more attractive to patients.
• Shift toward customizable treatments: Patients and practitioners are increasingly favoring treatments that can be customized to the individual's specific skin concerns and needs. Chemical peels, while effective, are often one-size-fits-all, whereas alternatives like laser treatments and microneedling can be tailored to target specific issues, providing more personalized results.

Popular alternatives to chemical peels

As chemical peels have become less popular, several alternative treatments have gained prominence. These options provide effective skin rejuvenation with fewer risks and less downtime:

• Laser skin resurfacing: Laser skin resurfacing uses focused light beams to remove layers of skin, stimulate collagen production, and promote the growth of new, healthier skin. It can effectively treat wrinkles, scars, and hyperpigmentation. 

Lasers offer precise control over the depth of treatment, allowing for customization based on the patient's skin type and concerns. Recovery time varies depending on the intensity of the treatment, but it is generally shorter than that of a deep chemical peel. Additionally, there is a lower risk of pigmentation changes compared to peels.

• Microneedling: Microneedling involves using a device with fine needles to create tiny punctures in the skin. These micro-injuries stimulate the body’s natural healing process, leading to the production of new collagen and elastin, which improve skin texture and tone.

Microneedling is minimally invasive, with shorter recovery times compared to chemical peels. It can be combined with other treatments, such as PRP (platelet-rich plasma), for enhanced results. The procedure is also safer for darker skin tones, which are more prone to pigmentation issues after chemical peels. The depth of the needles can be adjusted to target specific skin concerns, making it a versatile option for various skin types and issues.

• HydraFacial:  HydraFacial is a non-invasive treatment that combines cleansing, exfoliation, extraction, hydration, and antioxidant protection. It uses a specialized device to deliver these steps in a single session.

HydraFacial offers immediate results with no downtime, making it an appealing option for those looking for a quick refresh before an event or as a regular part of their skincare routine. It’s gentle yet effective, making it suitable for all skin types, including sensitive skin. The treatment can be tailored with different serums and boosters to address specific concerns like acne, hyperpigmentation, or fine lines.

• Radiofrequency (RF) skin tightening: Radiofrequency treatments use energy waves to heat the deeper layers of the skin, stimulating collagen production and tightening the skin. This non-invasive treatment is used to reduce wrinkles, improve skin texture, and enhance facial contours. 
• RF treatments are non-invasive, with little to no downtime. They are safe for all skin types and can be used on various parts of the body. The results develop gradually over several months, with improvements in skin tightness and texture.
• Photofacial (IPL - intense pulsed light): Photofacial treatments use intense pulsed light to target and treat skin discoloration, such as age spots, sun damage, and broken capillaries. The light energy penetrates the skin, breaking down pigmentation and stimulating collagen production.

Photofacials are non-invasive with minimal discomfort and downtime. They are particularly effective for treating pigmentation issues and can also improve skin texture and tone. The intensity and wavelength of the light can be adjusted to treat specific skin concerns, providing a tailored approach to skin rejuvenation.

5- Traditional liposuction

Traditional liposuction is still common, but newer techniques like laser-assisted liposuction (SmartLipo) and non-surgical fat reduction methods like CoolSculpting have taken over as they offer fat reduction with less recovery time and lower risk. Once the gold standard for surgical fat removal and body contouring, this procedure involves the surgical removal of fat deposits from specific areas of the body, such as the abdomen, thighs, buttocks, and arms, through a suction technique. 

Reasons for the decline in popularity

While liposuction can effectively reshape the body and reduce stubborn fat that is resistant to diet and exercise, several factors have led to its decreased demand, with many patients and practitioners now favoring less invasive alternatives.

• Invasiveness and recovery time: Traditional liposuction is a surgical procedure that requires incisions, anesthesia, and a recovery period. The invasiveness of the surgery can lead to significant bruising, swelling, and discomfort, with full recovery taking several weeks to months. Patients must also wear compression garments for an extended period to aid in healing and ensure optimal results. In today's fast-paced world, many individuals are seeking body contouring solutions that offer quicker recovery times and less discomfort.
• Risk of complications: As with any surgery, traditional liposuction carries risks such as infection, blood clots, fluid accumulation, uneven fat removal, and changes in skin sensation. These potential complications can be a deterrent for those considering the procedure, especially when compared to the safer, less invasive alternatives now available.
• Emergence of less invasive alternatives: The development of advanced, non-surgical fat reduction techniques has significantly contributed to the decline of traditional liposuction. These alternatives, which include options like laser-assisted liposuction, cryolipolysis (CoolSculpting), and radiofrequency-based treatments, offer effective fat reduction with less risk, less pain, and shorter recovery times.
• Changing aesthetic goals: There has been a shift in aesthetic preferences toward more natural-looking results and overall body contouring rather than just fat removal. Patients today are more interested in procedures that not only reduce fat but also tighten skin and improve body shape in a more harmonious way. Traditional liposuction, while effective at removing fat, does not address skin laxity or body contouring as comprehensively as some newer techniques.

Newer alternatives

As traditional liposuction has become less popular, several less invasive alternatives have gained traction. These options provide effective fat reduction with fewer risks and more benefits:

• Laser-assisted liposuction (SmartLipo): Laser-assisted liposuction, commonly known as SmartLipo, uses laser energy to liquefy fat before it is suctioned out of the body. The laser also stimulates collagen production, which helps to tighten the skin in the treated area.

This method is less invasive than traditional liposuction, with smaller incisions, reduced bruising, and a shorter recovery time. The added benefit of skin tightening makes it a popular choice for patients concerned about skin laxity after fat removal.

• Cryolipolysis (CoolSculpting): CoolSculpting is a non-surgical fat reduction treatment that uses controlled cooling to freeze and destroy fat cells, which are then naturally eliminated by the body over time. This procedure is particularly effective for targeting localized fat deposits.

CoolSculpting is completely non-invasive, requiring no incisions, anesthesia, or downtime. Patients can resume normal activities immediately after treatment. The results develop gradually over several weeks as the body processes and eliminates the frozen fat cells.

• Radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (BodyTite): BodyTite combines liposuction with radiofrequency energy to both remove fat and tighten the skin. The radiofrequency energy heats the tissue, promoting collagen production and improving skin firmness.

This method addresses both fat reduction and skin tightening in a single procedure, making it an excellent choice for patients who want more comprehensive body contouring results. The procedure is less invasive than traditional liposuction, with smaller incisions and a faster recovery time.

• Ultrasound-assisted liposuction (VASER Lipo): VASER Lipo uses ultrasound technology to break down fat cells before they are suctioned out. The ultrasound waves selectively target fat cells, leaving surrounding tissues intact.

VASER Lipo is less invasive than traditional liposuction, with less trauma to surrounding tissues, resulting in less bruising and faster recovery. It is also highly effective for sculpting and contouring the body, particularly in areas requiring precise fat removal.

• Radiofrequency or laser-based non-surgical fat reduction (Vanquish, SculpSure): Non-surgical fat reduction treatments like Vanquish and SculpSure use radiofrequency or laser energy to heat and destroy fat cells without the need for incisions or anesthesia. These treatments are particularly effective for patients with mild to moderate fat deposits.

These non-invasive treatments offer a convenient and comfortable option for fat reduction. Patients typically experience minimal discomfort and no downtime, making them ideal for those seeking a quick and easy solution.

6- Electrolysis hair removal

Electrolysis involves inserting a fine probe into the hair follicle and applying an electric current to destroy the follicle's ability to produce hair. Despite its long history and FDA approval as a permanent hair removal solution, electrolysis has seen a decline in popularity in recent years. This shift is due to several factors, including the rise of newer, more convenient technologies and changing patient preferences.

Reasons for the decline in popularity

While electrolysis remains the only FDA-approved method for permanent hair removal, its popularity has declined due to several factors.

• Time-consuming process: Electrolysis is a meticulous procedure that targets individual hair follicles one by one. As a result, it can be incredibly time-consuming, especially when treating larger areas of the body. Each session can last from 15 minutes to an hour, and multiple sessions are required to achieve full hair removal. For those with dense or extensive hair growth, the time commitment can be significant, leading many to seek faster alternatives.
• Discomfort during treatment: While electrolysis is generally safe, it can be uncomfortable. Patients often experience a stinging or pricking sensation during the procedure as the electric current is applied to each follicle. Although topical anesthetics can help, the discomfort can be a deterrent, particularly for those with a low pain tolerance or when treating sensitive areas.
• Emergence of laser hair removal: The advent of laser hair removal has been one of the most significant factors contributing to the decline of electrolysis. Laser hair removal offers a quicker, less painful, and more efficient method of reducing hair growth. It can treat larger areas of the body in a fraction of the time required for electrolysis and typically requires fewer sessions to achieve desired results. Although laser hair removal is not always permanent, it provides long-lasting reduction and is a more attractive option for many.
• Increased availability of at-home hair removal devices: The market for at-home hair removal devices, particularly those using intense pulsed light (IPL) technology, has grown substantially. These devices allow users to manage hair growth in the comfort of their own homes, offering a convenient alternative to in-office treatments like electrolysis. While not as effective as professional treatments, they are appealing for their ease of use and cost savings over time.
• Higher cost over time: Although electrolysis can offer permanent results, the cumulative cost of the many required sessions can be high, especially when treating larger areas. In comparison, newer technologies like laser hair removal, though initially expensive, may require fewer treatments, leading to lower overall costs for many patients.

Popular alternatives to electrolysis

As electrolysis has become less popular, several alternatives have gained traction, offering various benefits that appeal to different patient needs:

• Laser hair removal: Laser hair removal uses concentrated light to target and destroy hair follicles, reducing hair growth over time. It's effective for larger areas like the legs, back, and underarms.

Laser treatments are faster than electrolysis, as they can cover larger areas in a single session. The procedure is less painful and usually requires fewer sessions to see significant results. While not always permanent, laser hair removal offers long-term hair reduction, with many patients experiencing a significant decrease in hair growth for months or even years.

Also Read: 13 Laser Hair Removal Myths Debunked

• Intense pulsed light (IPL) devices: IPL devices emit broad-spectrum light to target hair follicles, similar to laser hair removal, but are generally less powerful. These devices are available for both professional and at-home use.

IPL treatments can be done at home with over-the-counter devices, making it a convenient and cost-effective option for many users. The treatment is also less painful and quicker than electrolysis.

• Waxing and sugaring: Waxing and sugaring involve applying a sticky substance to the skin and then removing it, pulling the hair out from the roots. These methods provide temporary hair removal but with longer-lasting results than shaving.

These methods are quick, relatively inexpensive, and can be done at home or by a professional. They also exfoliate the skin, leaving it smooth. While not permanent, regular waxing or sugaring can reduce hair growth over time, making the hair that does grow back finer and less dense.

• Depilatory creams: Depilatory creams chemically dissolve hair at the skin’s surface, offering a quick and painless way to remove hair. These creams are easy to use at home, inexpensive, and provide smooth skin without the need for shaving. Like shaving, the results are temporary, and hair typically grows back within a few days.
• At-home laser and IPL devices: Similar to professional laser treatments, these devices are designed for home use and offer a convenient way to reduce hair growth over time.

They provide the flexibility of treating hair at home, with the added benefit of long-term hair reduction. While not as powerful as professional treatments, they can still offer significant results.